Download the Complete WERC Team Manual 2020 (Coming Soon!)
Valuable details of report requirements and helpful hints on preparing a successful written report.
Brief Highlights for Written Report
Each task requires a separate written report addressing the proposed full-scale design.
1. The paper must include:
- A report cover identifying the school and task (not included in the page limit)
- A title page (counted as the first page)
- A table of contents
- An executive summary (maximum of two pages) highlighting the proposed solution
- The report body (include: background research, description of your team’s solution and performance, test data, and scale-up (costs, environmental/waste issues, public acceptance, schedule for implementation).
- Figures: photographs, line drawings and graphs for illustrative purposes (included in the page limit)
- References (included in the page limit)
- Audits (see #3 below) – These are not included in the page limit.
2. The body of the paper must include:
- Full-scale design description
- Technical evaluation
- Bench-scale/prototype design and performance (test data)
- Business Plan, including economic analysis and scale-up implementation schedule
- Waste generation considerations
- Health, Safety, and Environmental regulations
- Community Relations Plan (what efforts will be made to encourage public acceptance)
The report should be non-proprietary and omit product trade names.
3. Audits: University teams are required to have a separate audit to address each of the following: economics, health and legal issues. The audits should be made by professionals involved in the specific field. These audits will not be counted as part of your page limit. The audits can be made by faculty members, industrial representatives, experts, doctoral students, etc. For scoring purposes and ease of reading, the audits should be limited to 1-2 pages (not an edited copy of your paper).
Written Report Specifications
- Page limit: 26 pages.
- Font: Times, Times New Roman, or TMS Roman (or a similar serif type).
Size: 12 point
Major Headings: 12 points, Bold
Title: 14 points, Bold
Cover page (Title page)
Title: 2″ top margin
Centered (school name, team name, task number, advisor name, and team member names)
Top and bottom margins – 1″
Right and left margins – 1″
- Footer: Required on each page. Include the task number and name of the participating school.
- Spacing: Use 1.5 line spacing
- Title: Center, upper case, bold; 14 point type
- Major Headings: Left justify, upper case, bold; 12 point type
- Subheadings: 1 tab (5 spaces); bold, 12 point type
- Sub-subheadings: 2 tabs (10 spaces); underline, 12 point type
- Leading below headings: no more than 6 points. (Leading is vertical space).
- List and number all bibliographical references at the end of the paper.
- When referring to references in the text, type the corresponding reference number in superscript form.
Equation Numbers – Enclose equation numbers in parentheses
Page Numbers – Center bottom of the page
Symbols and Abbreviations – Use only standard symbols and abbreviations in text and illustrations.
Illustrations, Drawings and Photographs
- Line drawings and photographs should be reduced to proper size and placed as close to where they are referenced as possible.
- All lines should be black on white paper and heavy enough to be legible.
- All lettering should be large enough to be legible.
- Original illustrations should not exceed 8.5″ X 11″.
- Omit all unessential illustrations.
Written Report Submission
- Each team must submit a single PDF of the complete report (including the audits) and upload it to your team’s WERC account
- Deadline: 11:59 PM, March 23, 2020 (your time zone)
- Late reports will be penalized at a rate of 25 points per day.
- Only faculty and/or team leaders have access to upload the report.
- The PDF copy of the full report will be used for web-based scoring, so it must include all elements – including the audits.
Written Report Judging Criteria
Judges’ Scoring Rubric:
- Executive summary includes engineering basis for design and summary of results.
- Equipment and process selection based on in-depth research of process and equipment.
- Discussion of lab evaluation, testing, process monitoring, and waste generation.
- Discussion of legal, health, and safety (worker and public) implications for the entire process.
- Economic analysis and/or cost/benefit discussion.
- Professional audits/public involvement.
- Overall quality: grammar, organization, succinctness.
- Late Submission deduction (25 points per day late)