Task 1 – OPEN TASK

 

Background

The purpose of the Open Task is to create an opportunity for teams to present solutions to issues that are focused on the general area of the environment, including, but certainly not limited to, energy and water. Reliable, low-cost sources of energy, dependable sources of water for a variety of uses, and a clean environment are essential to continued, sustainable development around the world.  At the same time, experience in innovation is a key component in development of a high quality workforce leading to a competitive, economically viable society.

Pursuit of demonstrable, innovative solutions that are economically feasible and could be put into practice has always been a major emphasis of the competition.  In creation of the Open Task, it is our intent to encourage participation by multi-disciplinary teams who submit solutions to real-life issues related to the focus areas highlighted above.  In particular, response to a current issue of national importance is highly encouraged by WERCParticipation is invited and encouraged from students in all fields of engineering and science.

*Responding to a current issue of national importance is highly encouraged by WERC*

Return to top ↑

Problem Statement


Your team must identify a real-life environmental, energy, or water related issue and the market for your solution to this issue, design and demonstrate your proposed solution, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of your solution versus both current technologies and other possible approaches.

Return to top ↑

 Design Considerations


For this task, teams should design a solution to the problem identified, and create an experimental apparatus to demonstrate it.  Identify a test protocol which may be used to evaluate your solution.  Present a business case for your technology including potential incentives from appropriate levels of government and supporting economic metrics.  Consideration should be given to the following:

      • How variation in operational conditions impacts performance of the technology
      • Under what conditions is the proposed solution most effective, i.e. what are the limitations of the technology
      • What are appropriate metrics for evaluating the technology (i.e. cost to implement and maintain, energy requirements, waste generation, ease of operation, etc.)
      • How does this technology compare to other possible methods of problem mitigation
      • Identification of appropriate federal (USA), state and local laws and regulations
      • What the hazards of the proposed solution are and approaches to mitigate the issue

Return to top ↑

Bench-Scale Demonstration


During the bench-scale demonstration, your team should plan to present a functional bench-scale model that clearly conveys the proposed solution.  Your team should develop, demonstrate and present a complete package that includes technical performance as well as financial, regulatory, and safety information.

At least one month prior to the contest, your team must provide a detailed test plan for the proposed solution that will be used as part of the overall process of judging your solution.  Be aware that if analytical testing of a treated sample is required, the testing must take place over no more than a 48 hour period.  Samples must be made available with enough time for this testing to take place prior to the conclusion of the contest.  Laboratory testing requiring an extended period of time can not be done under the contest time constraints.  Prior coordination with the WERC team is required.  If you have any questions, please contact the WERC team.

Return to top ↑

Written Report Requirements


The written report should demonstrate your team’s insight into the full scope of the issue that you have chosen and include all aspects of the problem and your proposed solution. The report will be evaluated for quality of writing, organization, clarity, reason, and coherence. Standards for publications in technical journals apply.  In addition to the listed requirements, your report must address in detail the items highlighted in the Problem Statement, Design Considerations, and Evaluation Criteria.

 Return to top ↑

Evaluation Criteria


Each team is advised to read the Participation Guide for a comprehensive understanding of the contest evaluation criteria.  Upon registration, WERC will provide you with a copy of the Public Involvement Plan and Participation Guide.

Additionally, your proposed design will be evaluated on the following:

      • Technical fundamentals, performance, safety and other issues stated in the problem statement
      • Potential for real-life implementation
      • Comprehensiveness of performance metrics
      • Thoroughness and quality of the business plan and economic analysis
      • Originality, innovativeness, functionality, ease of use, maintainability, reliability, and affordability of the proposed technology

Because of the open nature of this task, WERC asks that you recommend appropriate fields of expertise and, if at all possible, people who might have this expertise and who might be invited to participate as judges.  We ask that you provide these recommendations by January 13, 2017.


Return to top ↑